Day 7 · 2026-10-30
15 launches checked60 claims quoted word for word87 user reports linked10 verified fixes linked6 corrections publishedLive 7 days5 of 5 founding sponsor spots left
AI launches, checked against real usersLast re-stamped 30 Oct 2026

AI models / Compare

Gemini 4 Argon vs LFM3: which delivered after 7 days?

Gemini 4 Argon is stamped Partly; LFM3 is still Too early to call, so this comparison isn't settled yet.

Gemini 4 ArgonLFM3
VerdictPartlyToo early
Claims held00
Claims mixed20
Claims failed10
Claims unclear13
User reports102
Launched13 Oct 202627 Oct 2026
Last stamped22 Oct 202629 Oct 2026

No. 005 · Google

Gemini 4 Argon

PartlyDay 7 verdict

It is live in the API and Gemini app, but the advertised 95% cache discount gave users zero cache hits, and many Pro and Business subscribers still can't use it in Antigravity.

Launched
13 Oct 2026
Stamped
22 Oct 2026
Claims
✓0 held · ~2 mixed · ✗1 failed · ?1 unclear
Reports
10 (1 praise · 8 problem · 1 mixed)

What they claimed

“Gemini 4 Argon is now globally available today for developers and enterprises via the API in AI Studio and Gemini platform, for Google AI Ultra subscribers in Google Antigravity, and Google AI Ultra and Pro subscribers in the Gemini app and AI Mode in Search.”
~ Mixed
“Today, we’re rolling out Gemini 4 Argon directly inside Google Antigravity for Google AI Pro and Ultra subscribers — available in the Antigravity desktop app and the Antigravity CLI.”
~ Mixed
“The model launches today at an introductory price of $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens (with cached input tokens at 95% off).”
✗ Fails
“Its depth and precision across multi-step tasks leads Argon to outperform other frontier models on benchmarks across domains, ranking #1 on the Vals Index”
? Unclear

Full receipt

No. 013 · Liquid AI

LFM3

Day 3 of 7
Too earlyDay 7 verdict

Two days in, only a few first-hand comments exist, and one reports a load failure and a wrong answer.

Launched
27 Oct 2026
Stamped
29 Oct 2026
Claims
✓0 held · ~0 mixed · ✗0 failed · ?3 unclear
Reports
2 (0 praise · 1 problem · 1 mixed)

What they claimed

“a new tri-hybrid architecture and training recipe allow LFM3-1.7B to outperform our previous LFM2.5-2.6B while using 35% fewer parameters.”
? Unclear
“the text model fits in about 1 GB at 4-bit precision.”
? Unclear
“256K context window for the text model.”
? Unclear

Full receipt

Both stamps come from the public user reports linked on each receipt, under the same method. Verdicts are opinion and are never paid for.

Keep comparingall AI models