AI launches, checked against real usersLast re-stamped 16 Oct 2026

Method

How we stamp a receipt

The short version: quote the launch, read the users, link everything, and say “too early” when we don’t know yet.

Companies and reviewers show launch day. We show what happens once real people use it. We’re not here to undermine anyone; we add one more opinion, with every source shown.

1. Pick the launch

We cover major AI launches people actually use to build: models, coding tools, app builders and agents. Launches come from vendor blogs and changelogs, release notes, and what’s trending on Hacker News and in developer forums.

2. Quote the claims, word for word

We open the official launch page and copy three to five concrete, checkable claims exactly as written. We don’t paraphrase claims and we don’t take them from press coverage. Footnote markers are the only thing we drop. Every claim links to the page it came from.

3. Collect real user reports

Issue trackers and support forums lean negative: people post when things break. We say so, and we count praise when we find it.

4. Mark each claim

5. Stamp the verdict

Delivered

The headline claims hold up in most solid user reports.

Partly

It shipped, but some claims fail or carry real caveats for a meaningful share of users.

Not yet

The headline claim does not hold for most users who report on it, or isn't available as described.

Too early

Fewer than about five solid user reports. We wait instead of guessing.

“A solid report” is one we opened ourselves that describes first-hand use of the launch, with enough detail to check. Fewer than about five of those means Too early, however loud the launch was.

6. Re-stamp and correct

We re-check receipts as new reports arrive. Every receipt shows when it was first stamped and last re-stamped. If a verdict or fact changes because we got something wrong, we log it publicly on the corrections page.