AI models / Compare
EmbeddingGemma 2 vs LFM3: which delivered after 7 days?
EmbeddingGemma 2 is stamped Delivered; LFM3 is still Too early to call, so this comparison isn't settled yet.
| EmbeddingGemma 2 | LFM3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Delivered | Too early |
| Claims held | 4 | 0 |
| Claims mixed | 1 | 0 |
| Claims failed | 0 | 0 |
| Claims unclear | 0 | 3 |
| User reports | 14 | 2 |
| Launched | 6 Oct 2026 | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Last stamped | 25 Oct 2026 | 29 Oct 2026 |
No. 009 · Google
EmbeddingGemma 2
The open weights, the shared text-image-audio space and the code gains check out in independent tests; text-only users get no boost, as Google said.
- Launched
- 6 Oct 2026
- Stamped
- 25 Oct 2026
- Claims
- ✓4 held · ~1 mixed · ✗0 failed · ?0 unclear
- Reports
- 14 (6 praise · 5 problem · 3 mixed)
What they claimed
“Today, we’re launching EmbeddingGemma 2, expanding beyond text to unify code, images, video, and audio in a shared embedding space.”✓ Holds
“Built on the Gemma 4 architecture and released under a commercially permissive Apache 2.0 license, EmbeddingGemma 2 has 740 million parameters, making it optimal for on-device inference.”✓ Holds
“Using Matryoshka Representation Learning (MRL), developers can dynamically truncate output vectors from 768 dimensions down to 512, 256, or 128 dimensions.”✓ Holds
“EmbeddingGemma 2 matches the strong multilingual text performance of EmbeddingGemma while delivering a significant 9.92-point improvement on code performance (in MTEB Code, from 68.76 to 78.68), making it well-suited for local codebase indexing, semantic code search, and coding agent retrieval.”✓ Holds
“We worked closely with the following partners to ensure EmbeddingGemma 2 works immediately where you build:”~ Mixed
No. 013 · Liquid AI
LFM3
Day 3 of 7Two days in, only a few first-hand comments exist, and one reports a load failure and a wrong answer.
- Launched
- 27 Oct 2026
- Stamped
- 29 Oct 2026
- Claims
- ✓0 held · ~0 mixed · ✗0 failed · ?3 unclear
- Reports
- 2 (0 praise · 1 problem · 1 mixed)
What they claimed
“a new tri-hybrid architecture and training recipe allow LFM3-1.7B to outperform our previous LFM2.5-2.6B while using 35% fewer parameters.”? Unclear
“the text model fits in about 1 GB at 4-bit precision.”? Unclear
“256K context window for the text model.”? Unclear
Both stamps come from the public user reports linked on each receipt, under the same method. Verdicts are opinion and are never paid for.
Keep comparingall AI models
- EmbeddingGemma 2 alternatives
- LFM3 alternatives
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs EmbeddingGemma 2
- DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 vs EmbeddingGemma 2
- EmbeddingGemma 2 vs Gemini 4 Argon
- EmbeddingGemma 2 vs GPT-6.1 Sol
- EmbeddingGemma 2 vs Muse Spark Open
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs LFM3
- DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 vs LFM3
- Gemini 4 Argon vs LFM3
Weekly email · Fridays 14:00 CEST
Get the Friday Receipt
Every Friday: the week’s new day 7 receipts, the ones we re-stamped, and any corrections. One email, no sponsors from companies we review.
Prefer not to give an email? Follow the RSS feed or @day7dev on X.