AI models / Compare
Claude Opus 5.5 vs EmbeddingGemma 2: which delivered after 7 days?
EmbeddingGemma 2 got the stronger stamp (Delivered) against Claude Opus 5.5 (Partly), based on the user reports linked on each receipt.
| Claude Opus 5.5 | EmbeddingGemma 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Partly | Delivered |
| Claims held | 0 | 4 |
| Claims mixed | 3 | 1 |
| Claims failed | 0 | 0 |
| Claims unclear | 2 | 0 |
| User reports | 7 | 14 |
| Launched | 22 Sept 2026 | 6 Oct 2026 |
| Last stamped | 22 Oct 2026 | 25 Oct 2026 |
No. 002 · Anthropic
Claude Opus 5.5
The lower list price is real, but users report limits draining faster, more thinking tokens and safeguard false alarms, and nobody has independently confirmed the 40% saving.
- Launched
- 22 Sept 2026
- Stamped
- 22 Oct 2026
- Claims
- ✓0 held · ~3 mixed · ✗0 failed · ?2 unclear
- Reports
- 7 (1 praise · 6 problem · 0 mixed)
What they claimed
“It performs at the level of Claude Fable 5.1 on most work and costs 40% less to run than Opus 5.”~ Mixed
“Input and output tokens are $4 and $20 per million, 20% less than Opus 5.”? Unclear
“In addition to the price drop, we’re increasing five-hour usage limits on Pro, Max, Team, and seat-based Enterprise plans.”~ Mixed
“It is much less likely than recent models to take hard-to-reverse actions or act outside the boundaries it’s been given”~ Mixed
“Opus 5.5 also generates output more than 30% faster than Opus 5.”? Unclear
No. 009 · Google
EmbeddingGemma 2
The open weights, the shared text-image-audio space and the code gains check out in independent tests; text-only users get no boost, as Google said.
- Launched
- 6 Oct 2026
- Stamped
- 25 Oct 2026
- Claims
- ✓4 held · ~1 mixed · ✗0 failed · ?0 unclear
- Reports
- 14 (6 praise · 5 problem · 3 mixed)
What they claimed
“Today, we’re launching EmbeddingGemma 2, expanding beyond text to unify code, images, video, and audio in a shared embedding space.”✓ Holds
“Built on the Gemma 4 architecture and released under a commercially permissive Apache 2.0 license, EmbeddingGemma 2 has 740 million parameters, making it optimal for on-device inference.”✓ Holds
“Using Matryoshka Representation Learning (MRL), developers can dynamically truncate output vectors from 768 dimensions down to 512, 256, or 128 dimensions.”✓ Holds
“EmbeddingGemma 2 matches the strong multilingual text performance of EmbeddingGemma while delivering a significant 9.92-point improvement on code performance (in MTEB Code, from 68.76 to 78.68), making it well-suited for local codebase indexing, semantic code search, and coding agent retrieval.”✓ Holds
“We worked closely with the following partners to ensure EmbeddingGemma 2 works immediately where you build:”~ Mixed
Both stamps come from the public user reports linked on each receipt, under the same method. Verdicts are opinion and are never paid for.
Keep comparingall AI models
- Claude Opus 5.5 alternatives
- EmbeddingGemma 2 alternatives
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Argon
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs LFM3
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Spark Open
- DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 vs EmbeddingGemma 2
- EmbeddingGemma 2 vs Gemini 4 Argon
- EmbeddingGemma 2 vs GPT-6.1 Sol
Weekly email · Fridays 14:00 CEST
Get the Friday Receipt
Every Friday: the week’s new day 7 receipts, the ones we re-stamped, and any corrections. One email, no sponsors from companies we review.
Prefer not to give an email? Follow the RSS feed or @day7dev on X.