Day 7 · 2026-10-30
15 launches checked60 claims quoted word for word113 user reports linked10 verified fixes linked26 corrections publishedLive 7 days5 of 5 founding sponsor spots left
Day 7Launch day vs. day 7
AI launches, checked against real usersLast re-stamped 30 Oct 2026

AI models / Compare

EmbeddingGemma 2 vs GPT-6.1 Terra: which delivered after 7 days?

EmbeddingGemma 2 is stamped Delivered; GPT-6.1 Terra is still Too early to call, so this comparison isn't settled yet.

EmbeddingGemma 2GPT-6.1 Terra
VerdictDeliveredToo early
Claims held33
Claims mixed20
Claims failed01
Claims unclear00
User reports162
Launched6 Oct 202626 Oct 2026
Last stamped30 Oct 202630 Oct 2026

No. 009 · Google

EmbeddingGemma 2

DeliveredDay 7 verdict

The open weights, shared multimodal space and smaller sizes check out in independent tests; multilingual parity is shaky outside English, and runtime support arrived late.

Launched
6 Oct 2026
Stamped
30 Oct 2026
Claims
✓3 held · ~2 mixed · ✗0 failed · ?0 unclear
Reports
16 (7 praise · 5 problem · 4 mixed)

What they claimed

“Today, we’re launching EmbeddingGemma 2, expanding beyond text to unify code, images, video, and audio in a shared embedding space.”
✓ Holds
“Built on the Gemma 4 architecture and released under a commercially permissive Apache 2.0 license, EmbeddingGemma 2 has 740 million parameters, making it optimal for on-device inference.”
✓ Holds
“Using Matryoshka Representation Learning (MRL), developers can dynamically truncate output vectors from 768 dimensions down to 512, 256, or 128 dimensions.”
✓ Holds
“EmbeddingGemma 2 matches the strong multilingual text performance of EmbeddingGemma while delivering a significant 9.92-point improvement on code performance (in MTEB Code, from 68.76 to 78.68), making it well-suited for local codebase indexing, semantic code search, and coding agent retrieval.”
~ Mixed
“We worked closely with the following partners to ensure EmbeddingGemma 2 works immediately where you build:”
~ Mixed

Full receipt

No. 011 · OpenAI

GPT-6.1 Terra

Day 4 of 7
Too earlyDay 7 verdict

Cheap and the coding gain is real, but independent timing finds it about 15 to 25% faster than Sol, nowhere near 3x.

Launched
26 Oct 2026
Stamped
30 Oct 2026
Claims
✓3 held · ~0 mixed · ✗1 failed · ?0 unclear
Reports
2 (0 praise · 0 problem · 2 mixed)

What they claimed

“At max effort, Terra is over three times as token efficient as Claude Opus 5.5, and one-fourth its price per token, resulting in a ~9x lower cost per task.”
✓ Holds
“Terra is also much quicker, completing tasks over three times faster than both GPT-6 Astra and GPT-6.1 Sol.”
✗ Fails
“At maximum reasoning effort, GPT‑6.1 Terra solves 50.3% of tasks, more than double GPT‑5.6 Terra’s published score of 21.5%.”
✓ Holds
“Standard API pricing is $1 per million input tokens, $0.05 per million cached input tokens, and $5 per million output tokens.”
✓ Holds

Full receipt

Both stamps come from the public user reports linked on each receipt, under the same method. Verdicts are opinion and are never paid for.

Keep comparingall AI models