Day 7 · 2026-10-31
18 launches checked71 claims quoted word for word121 user reports linked10 verified fixes linked26 corrections publishedLive 8 days5 of 5 founding sponsor spots left
AI launches, checked against real usersLast re-stamped 31 Oct 2026

AI models / Compare

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Mistral Large 4: which delivered after 7 days?

GPT-6.1 Sol is stamped Delivered; Mistral Large 4 is still Too early to call, so this comparison isn't settled yet.

GPT-6.1 SolMistral Large 4
VerdictDeliveredToo early
Claims held21
Claims mixed30
Claims failed00
Claims unclear02
User reports73
Launched29 Sept 202629 Oct 2026
Last stamped30 Oct 202631 Oct 2026

No. 004 · OpenAI

GPT-6.1 Sol

DeliveredDay 7 verdict

Near-Astra performance for less money holds in independent tests, and the prices are as listed. Day-one access was patchy and Ultrafast is top-plan only.

Launched
29 Sept 2026
Stamped
30 Oct 2026
Claims
✓2 held · ~3 mixed · ✗0 failed · ?0 unclear
Reports
7 (0 praise · 4 problem · 3 mixed)

What they claimed

“GPT-6.1 Sol is available starting today to all Plus, Pro, Business, Enterprise, and Edu users in ChatGPT Work and Codex.”
~ Mixed
“In the coming days, we’ll also offer GPT-6.1 Sol Ultrafast, with up to 8x faster token generation compared to its standard speed in Codex.”
~ Mixed
“GPT-6.1 Sol is more transparent about its limitations and more reliable at respecting user intent and safety constraints.”
~ Mixed
“We’re introducing GPT-6.1 Sol, an upgrade to GPT-6 Sol that nearly matches GPT-6 Astra’s intelligence on agentic coding, computer use, and professional work at one-fifth of Astra’s standard input and output token prices.”
✓ Holds
“Its standard API prices are $2 per million input tokens, $0.10 per million cached input tokens, and $10 per million output tokens.”
✓ Holds

Full receipt

No. 017 · Mistral AI

Mistral Large 4

Day 2 of 7
Too earlyDay 7 verdict

Weights are out, but few hands-on reports yet; the cybersecurity claim leans on one index and is untested by users.

Launched
29 Oct 2026
Stamped
31 Oct 2026
Claims
✓1 held · ~0 mixed · ✗0 failed · ?2 unclear
Reports
3 (0 praise · 3 problem · 0 mixed)

What they claimed

“ML4 is one of the world's strongest AI models for cybersecurity.”
? Unclear
“We will release the weights by the end of the month.”
✓ Holds
“significantly outperforming any open-weight model developed in the US or Europe”
? Unclear

Full receipt

Both stamps come from the public user reports linked on each receipt, under the same method. Verdicts are opinion and are never paid for.

Keep comparingall AI models